Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Becker House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Paula Modersohn-Becker. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Paula Becker House

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

While Paula Modersohn-Becker may be notable, the fact she lived here doesn't make this house notable on its own, and there is nothing else to suggest this building is notable. Also the single source provided is about a street being named after Becker and only mentions the house as a possible location for a commemorative plaque Jac 16888  Talk 15:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

The house is opened as a private museum for the public. I think this is important enough. If I find more sources, I'll expand the article. --House1630 (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Paula Modersohn-Becker. If it's a museum devoted to her, it certainly deserves some coverage there. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * To avoid wasting any more of your time and that of your fellow editors, please read WP:ATA before commenting further. EEng (talk) 03:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as a new museum. The article is easily long enough to stand on its own, & can then be sorted into Museum categories etc. The German WP is pretty strict, and has had much the same article since 2007. Johnbod (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * To avoid wasting any more of your time and that of your fellow editors, please read WP:ATA before commenting further. EEng (talk) 03:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Obvious merge There are no more than three sentences in the article that belong in the encyclopedia under any heading -- and they belong in the P M-B article. EEng (talk) 03:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge while I don't think this discussion is wasting anyone's time, I agree that a merge to Paula Modersohn-Becker makes sense. It's possible the museum will become notable and can be spun out at that point StarM 01:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.