Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Leggett Chase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Paula Leggett Chase

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. While the subject has appeared in several notable productions, they do not appear to have had important roles, and the claim in the lead that the subject had starring roles in Law & Order and 30 Rock appears to be false. signed, Rosguill talk 22:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Further to WP:NEXIST, the actress passes the WP:GNG for significant coverage in her lead role in Queen of Hearts. Chase played Diana in that show. She is covered also in other roles. I've added some references to the article. Will format these soon. gidonb (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Also passes WP:NACTOR for significant roles in multiple television shows and musical productions. See details in the improved article. gidonb (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete According to WP:NACTOR, she needs to have multiple significant roles to be considered notable and I have seen only one of it here (Television roles are all minor too). References are also poor, one is a review of Queen of Hearts, one is an article locked behind a log-in. And the others are biographical which do not establish notability. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Passes WP:NACTOR per "significant roles in multiple stage performances" and most definitely passes the WP:GNG per "significant coverage in reliable sources." I took the Times quote out from behind the pay wall via Google Books. Time is an important magazine isn't it? Especially in the previous millennium. There is no quality problem with the prime references (the first nine) that clearly pull the actress across the GNG line. gidonb (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I see numerous supporting and minor roles, and an occasional starring role in regional theater, but nothing that satisfies WP:NACTOR's requirements of multiple significant roles. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  22:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete talent and longevity alone do not meet the notability requirements for actors. See WP:NACTOR for the need for coverage and not just mentions.  Needs more significant coverage to meet the guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 02:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.