Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Rego, Secrets and Stories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'll restore it upon request if and when more sources become available and somebody decides to work on this. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Paula Rego, Secrets and Stories

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of satisfying WP:NB. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * My first instinct was that this was probably just too soon. But I see it already has Portuguese RS here. So that's one. She's a major Portuguese painter, now based in London, and it's apparently going to air on the BBC in a matter of weeks, then be followed by a theatrical release in Portugal, during which the ref above will I'm sure be joined by more reviews. Recommend we simply userfy or send to draft space if more reliable sources cannot be found, for now.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Without proper independent sources, this is a candidate for speedy as promotional. Once sources exist, then it can be recreated from independent reviews. What is present does not appear worth retaining. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This does seem a little soon, but the Portuguese review is as Shawn in Montreal says already a reliable source, and it makes it clear this is a serious and significant documentary. However it would be sensible to wait for a few more sources, which will certainly come when the film is released in Britain in March. I'd agree therefore that we should userfy or otherwise send back to draft for now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * speedy delete for promotion (the only non promotional part is the release section.) It does sound as if it will be notable, but this page's writing is not what we want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete the artist is obviously notable, but the documentary is not (no notability by association). Nabla (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.