Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauline Barnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Pauline Barnett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBIO. Cannot find any sources that do more than mention subject incidentally. Rogermx (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, winner of notable award. There will be significant contemporary news coverage, even if you can't find it with a simple Google search.  I have added Blomberg biography as a reference. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. A Bloomberg listing is not particularly useful for establishing notability. Note: Rich Farmbrough created this article and a lot of other stubs for winners of the Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion, a award that doesn't appear to be all that significant. Many of these other winners' articles have been tagged for questionable notability, e.g. Pamela Neal, Janette Pallas, Nicholas O'Shiel, Anne Duncan, etc., and should be deleted too. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence anyone who gets this award is automatically notable, and many of the others should go too. Should otherwise be sources covering them besides just for the award. Unclear why there's The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (2011), etc. as well. Reywas92Talk 22:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added a couple of sources to the article. I don't see why the award would not qualify for WP:ANYBIO - it's a national award, not a local one, and there were 10 recipients of that award each year, in a population of about 60 million overall. Assuming that about 3/4 of the population were aged 20+, the award was given to 10 in 45,000,000 people, or 2.22%, which is surely notable. RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as winner of notable award and User:RebeccaGreen has improved the article with more references giving credibility to its notability. Thanks MyanmarBBQ (talk) 02:10, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --  Dane talk  04:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even though this article has been improved since nomination, I don't see any notability. Doesn't pass WP:GNG and I think this article falls under WP:NCORP as well - not even a notable business associated. Skirts89 11:16, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:NCORP is not for people, it's for organisations. The question is not whether the organisation/s she is associated with are notable, but whether she herself meets any notability criteria. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you, perhaps I wasn't clear. I merely included that comment to indicate that not only is the subject not noteworthy, the company she is associated with isn't noteworthy either. Thanks! Skirts89 13:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This improved article still fails WP:GNG because the subject lacks sustained WP:SIGCOV of her life or career, and her "fame" revolves around WP:ONEEVENT - an award from the Queen of Britain. As notability is not WP:NOTINHERITED, there is no reason to hold this particular royal honor as an automatic grant of notability anymore then we would a 100th birthday card from the Queen (and yes, I know that is more common then this award, but my point still stands). Newshunter12 (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.