Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauline Bull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that sources are not sufficiently in-depth to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Pauline Bull

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page only has 2 sources, and most of the information is unsourced. (I can't find any more sources about her) Larryzhao123 (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Larryzhao123 (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Larryzhao123 (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:V and WP:SIGCOV. I don't see any books, magazine articles, web pages, or newspaper articles about this person in particular. Bearian (talk) 21:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete when we have this level of coverage of winning a beauty contest, doing so is clearly not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.