Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauline Rennie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nominator has withdrawn but the discussion has been open long enough and has enough participation for a "keep" close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Pauline Rennie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Google web, news and book searches do not reveal independent WP:RS indicating that this individual meets either WP:BASIC or WP:ENTERTAINER. Not be confused with psychologist and author Pauline Rennie Peyton, who may actually merit an article of her own. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep and tag for referencing. The IMDB credit list is very likely incomplete, and her career appears to date back to the days of radio.  This article behind a pay wall clearly has her as the primary subject.  The snippet available for view shows that her work goes back much further that the Care Bears.  Seethis google news search and look at the result for "RADIO PROGRAMS SCHEDULED FOR BROADCAST THIS WEEK" which does indicate that she was working in radio.  She is also mentioned in these two books:, .  I suspect that the bulk of her career predate the internet and would have offline sources documenting this. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator. While the Toronto Star article is just one WP:RS it's an awfully important one. I'm withdrawing on that basis. If you could add that ref to the article it would be most helpful, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I was just about to add it myself. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha! Edit conflict! I was just going to note that I had added the ref. -- Whpq (talk) 20:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements made since nomination and the nominator's withdrawal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.