Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Freire Institute, Malta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 23:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Paulo Freire Institute, Malta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, looks like a fundraising page The Banner talk 16:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  GameInfirmary   Talk  16:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions.  GameInfirmary   Talk  16:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment This is an organization that provides vocational training and other community classes, not a regular academic school, so it needs to meet WP:ORGCRIT AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Analysis of existing sources, which demonstrates the promotional natrue of the article and its complete failure of GNG or ORGCRIT{:
 * Routledge book source that has half a sentence on the centre offering cooking classes. Fails ORGCRIT
 * A Word document called "Parents Education and Counselling Project Socrates - Grundtvig 2, Learning Partnership". Fail ORGCRIT.
 * Dead link.
 * Local shopping guide "wowCity" that shows the address of the institute. No coverage at all. Fails ORGCRIT
 * A separate non-profit progam description that included three words: Paolo Feire Institute. fails ORGCRIT
 * A news article relating to $700 raised for the institute by runners.
 * A Jesuits in Malta page... not independent, so fails WP:ORGCRIT.
 * Another Jesuits in Malta page.
 * A news article about how Vodaphone is supporting a book published by the institute. Minor coverage.
 * A few sentences in a Malta government report that mentions the institute. Not in-depth, fails ORGCRIT.
 * ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Which CSD criteria would you apply here? TheMagikCow (T) (C) 19:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * G11, unless I am wrong about speedy. this is because the glowing text of the article has been produced from probably less than 200 words of actual source coverage. It's advertising copy. It's obvious the emperor has no clothes.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This doesn't look like a G11 candidate - can we have more people discussing the article?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The article fails WP:ORGCRIT as explained source by source by ThatMontrealIP. The article is heavily promotional and has the pretty overt air of trying to solicit donations to the origination. Newshunter12 (talk) 12:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.