Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulys sub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Paulys sub
Non-notable minor regional sub chain. Article was proposed for deletion but then deprodded by an anonymous editor. —C.Fred (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - NN. Fopkins | Talk 04:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Under what criteria would it be speedy-able? It's a company and not a person/group, so the criteria for no assertion of notability isn't applicable. —C.Fred (talk) 04:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I would consider this speedy-able under A7. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I include NN companies in this category.  Only if the notability is questionable or disputed would I take it to AfD.  But again, please, correct me if I'm wrong. Fopkins | Talk 05:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If one were to stick to the wording of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, with regard to A7's statement of, "real person, group of people, band, or club", it's not speediable as a company is not exactly a "group of people" or a "club". There's a lot of leeway in tagging things speedy under the various criteria. For instance, G4 specifically states "This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions...", but I see it used for to tag things that were speedy deleted, but, I don't really care and leave it there. Some other people do care and the tag vanishes. In short, it all depends on the person that comes by next and sees the tag and whether or not they've read WP:SNOW. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 10:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Regardless of how one wishes to play around with the wording, A7 definitely does not apply to corporations. There have been attempts to expand it to cover companies, but they have not been successful yet.  fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 15:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Eminently non-notable, and note that the original version of the article was created solely for disparagement purposes. Kiscica 05:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable outside local community. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 10:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  nn and no sources M  a  rtinp23  10:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete local interest only   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete at regular speed as business fails WP:CORP.--Isotope23 14:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable local restaurant chain. J I P  | Talk 15:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. non notable. —dima /sb.tk/ 20:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.