Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Paux

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable software product. Most of the provided references do not seem to be about the product itself, although some may give minor passing mentions. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Sabine Strasser (talk) 20:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)In most of the cases these mentions are not minor, they are the conclusion. The PAUX methode has become popular and a scientific impact. Next wednesday for example will be a talk about PAUX on the tcworld by the head of the department for the W3C office of Germany and Austria. Maybe we should add more references? 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 14:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is about another Content Management System with an integrated semantic text database. Sounds like the software is some kind of melange between a database and a wiki.  I looked through some of the "scientific references".  One was a PDF made from a slideshow presentation that did not appear to mention the product.  The ones with searchable text either had incidental mentions or none at all.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.