Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavao Keglević (Croatia) - Peter Markland (England) 1975


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Pavao Keglević (Croatia) - Peter Markland (England) 1975

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This chess game does not seem notable. SyG (talk) 11:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC) *Delete. We have articles on a handful of famous games, such as the Evergreen game, Immortal game and Kasparov's defeat to a computer, but this game does not meet those high standards - I don't see the notability.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a regular high-level correspondence chess game, but there is no evidence of this being the subject of much attention. The comment about this game being excellent despite lack of computer assistance appears to be original research. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't take part in this discussion, because I had written this article, but I had written only from the literature, and I do not know whether is it true what is written in the literature or is not. Sorry, my English is not the best, isn't it. User:Budija, 26. September 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 17:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete - I don't see that this game is that notable, and the article seems to be trying to make a point about computers in chess. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this is a good-faith attempt to improve wikipedia, but this particular chess game doesn't seem notable enough to warrant an article. Quale (talk) 02:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This game was not notable. 29 September 2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.186.253.15 (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.