Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Tulaev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) buff  bills  7701  16:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Pavel Tulaev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Article lacks non-trivial independent references. Appears to fail WP:BIO. red dog six (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Do a little research, he is a huge name in Rodnovery and Russian New Right. Rather than promoting deletion, do a little research and you also can find the relevant information, and citations. Help me make this article as good as it can be with verified information rather than simply requesting a deletion. He is as well known as David Duke and Stephen A. McNallen, if not bigger, but maybe it is because you are limited to English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.230.125 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment - The onus is on the author to provide adequate references to support the article. If you cannot do so, the article may not survive the AfD.  red dog six  (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Sources may be in any language, can use Google Translate. Please list sources, here or in the article. The best sources are in magazines, newspapers and journals that are about (but not by) Pavel Tulaev, more than mere mentions significant coverage. I'll try to find some but don't speak the language so a native speaker who knows the subject will have better luck finding sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete appears to be a case of WP:FRINGE. Claims to be a historian. Associated with white power groups. The history books are undoubtedly negationism, as is the case with all these groups, outside mainstream. As FRINGE, requires coverage in reliable mainstream press, sources that are not white power associated such as this true believer source "Speaking the Truth". His Cyrillic spelling is "Павел Тулаев", searched through the first 20 pages of GHITS and see a lot but nothing mainstream. Keeping an open mind however if someone can produces a lot of sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * More independent references coming soon - mainstream and non WP. Please bare with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎92.233.230.125 (talk • contribs)
 * No problem. BTW you can sign posts with four tilde marks like this: ~ (I added a "unsigned" to your last post above since it wasn't signed.) -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.