Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Tulaev (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 01:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Pavel Tulaev
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable scholar. Lacks reliable sources, previous AfD was somehow closed as no consensus in spite of the lack of good sources for notability. Thargor Orlando (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. His work is occasionally cited, through nothing I see suggests major notability due to high citation count. Would be nice to hear from a Russian-speaker regarding Russian sources. English sources do not support notability, I think. Although the article claims he authored seven books, that may be enough to make him notable, perhaps? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Hitro  talk  21:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Hitro  talk  21:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

KEEP - sources are being added slowly, but they are coming. Especially Russian ones. It is unfair to view validity on English sources alone. He is a well known author, the leader of the new right in Russia, etc. And he is cited by academics, in English yes, and many more in Russian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pontifact (talk • contribs) 15:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.