Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Pavuk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet another unsourced(except one primary source) article which has no notability. Inactive project with no reviews or any other reliable source, nor could I find anything relevant. Article was created by a SPA. Maybe the only developer for this project. Just for advertising. mabdul 14:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 15:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

comment: Google books gives som sources, e.g. this Christian75 (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to Web crawler and mention it there. --Northernhenge (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable project which was stillborn back in 2008? --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Still alive but no evidence offered of notability. --Northernhenge (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.