Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawan Kumar Bharti (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Pawan Kumar Bharti
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously soft deleted. This BLP has been repeatedly created by its subject. The subject, however, is not the topic of any substantial coverage in any reliable source (WP:GNG, WP:BASIC). There's no indication WP:ACADEMIC is met either. JFHJr (㊟) 17:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Zero independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete can't see any evidence that the subject meets any of our notability criteria, independent sources appear to be nonexistent. Biographies of people from the Indian subcontinent often claim that the subject is "well known", which is rarely true. Hut 8.5 12:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt No signs of passing WP:PROF (0 citations in Gscholar under full name, searching by initials for Indians is contraindicated due to, well, ridiculous number of collisions), no sign of any sourcing under the Gnews link. Links in article do not contribute meaningfully to discussion. Ray  Talk 15:47, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.