Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawistik Lodge (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Pawistik Lodge
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It is not notable, just a fishing cabin lodge, and other reasons are made on it's own page: advertisement, orphan Airmain (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No particular claim to notability - not in itself or even accrued notability from other sources. Reads like an advertisement to me. It would appear from the discussion page that there is a distinct conflict of interest involved, lending weight to my distinct feeling of spam being not very far away. The article has been around since June 2008, but still only is linked to a Wikipedia article about an airport that only has one sentence in it - and doesn't mention the lodge at all. Probably there as a way of telling people how to get there. The other reference linked is the company website. Possibly this is because there are no references to be found other than directories and adverts - which merely establish probable existence. Do I need to say more? Peridon (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —Bearcat (talk) 22:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of some clear demonstration of notability. DGG (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There doesn't seem to have been any improvement or demonstration of notability since the last deletion nomination. Tim  meh  !  23:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.