Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawn & Co (bar)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Pawn & Co (bar)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like advertised page just to promote the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.   Mr RD     17:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG requirements.LM2000 (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I've just blocked the article creator as being a spam-only account and deleted most of the spam articles they created. This article is spammy as well, and notability is not really established. Nick-D (talk) 01:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * delete Too badly written to stay.  If you're going to spam, up your game and at least write a decent article. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.