Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawn to queen

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Essjay ·  Talk 12:51, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Pawn to queen
It's not even notable fanfic in the context of Potter fandom, let alone an encyclopedic topic. Smells like vanity/advertising. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 09:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete Right.--ThomasK 10:11, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Nothing but a pair of links. Harro5 09:33, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn fanfic. Ken 13:16, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fanfic in general can be assumed to be non-notable. It would have to be published in an officially licensed book (like Strange New Worlds for Star Trek) to be even remotely notable.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 19:07, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fancruft. Vanity.  Robert A West 21:54, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and then stomp on the little torn up pieces afterwards. Nandesuka 22:31, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn fanfic. -- Etacar11   02:38, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable fanfic --Angr/undefined 07:35, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fanfic. Vashti 13:09, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..