Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawprints of Katrina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure). Till 11:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Pawprints of Katrina

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Borderline notable at best; 215 copies only in Worldcat, which is very little for a book on a subject which would seem so appealing. Minor reviews. Much of the article is about the various animal rescues, not the book. Typical example of the current standard of promotional writing on Wikipedia  DGG ( talk ) 02:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep A search turned up two additional reviews from The Times-Picayune and Tampa Bay Times, both reliable sources. They are in the article now. The article has been edited and the stories about animals deleted except for 2 that were covered by the media. The book was included at the Nat'l Book Festival in D.C. which should count toward notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AuthorAuthor (talk • contribs) 23:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Indication of widespread media coverage, meets book notability requirements. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.