Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paxful


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Paxful

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP reads like a press release JMHamo (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I was under the impression that the CNBC and VOA coverage was enough to demonstrate notability, although I agree that the article reads much like an ad. signed,Rosguill talk 20:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment, as an AfD we could agree to remove it under WP:G11 grounds, if we thought it was of that level. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No comment on notabiliy for time being, but it can be moved to draft if we want for cleanup. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  02:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment, i have cleaned up the article a bit and added more neutral info as well as removng content that could be seen as promotional scottledeuce (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * oppose/keep, the article can be made more neutral but i think its worty or mention just for hte recent links and press and publicity of backpage connections and mentions
 * Note to closing Admin The last !vote was made from an Estonian IP address, most probably related to the subject. JMHamo (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I think it likely meets the general notability guideline. I don't think it meets the more stringent WP:CORPDEPTH guideline, though, as there are just a few reliable articles that fit that bill. 71.163.163.163 (talk) 22:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:ORGDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: There are two sources I was able to find, both of which are being used in the page, that are reliable and could establish notability. As it stands however, the article reads like an advertisement. Dr-Bracket (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.