Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payback India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Payback India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a follow up to Articles for deletion/Payback (loyalty card) which was closed as delete back in 2017. This version is a bit more detailed and includes an awards section, but none of them look significant enough to convey notability and not much else is sourced. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note related discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 29. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:05, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 00:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 00:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify or Delete - Based on Google queries, Payback India complies with WP:GNG. There are many coverage from independent sources about it. However, this article was written in "Promotional" tone as per WP:PROMOTION. If someone could rewrite it and composed in encyclopedic tone, then it can be kept. Therefore, my vote is to move it to draft. If there is no attempt to improve it, then my vote is Delete - Jay (talk) 12:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I looked at the available online references and there is nothing that passes WP:ORGCRIT. There are some articles that look good on their face like this one, but further digging shows is a reprint of a press release. As such, I don't think draftify would work as there is nothing that could be added to make it notable. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.