Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paypoint.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to PayPoint.  So Why  09:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Paypoint.net

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, no independent reliable sources. Lots of Google hits, but Google News shows only 6 hits with no significant secondary coverage among them. Huon (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Huon,

I am new to wikipedia, so I am not quite sure what went wrong. I've edited a couple of bits on the article and I hope that would have made the difference.

What do you mean by google hits? Please let me know if there's anything else that could be wrong with this article and I will edit it to reflect this.

Thanks, (Dina Jones (talk) 10:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC))
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dunbot,

Apologies for all these questions.

What do you mean is now listed? is it still up for deletion? if so what can I do to change this?

Thansk in advance for your help. (Dina Jones (talk)) —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Comment - it just means that the person who nominated the article for creation didn't do it properly and the bot has fixed it. It is still nominated for deletion.


 * Delete per nomination: a processor of secure, real-time, online credit and debit card transactions - i.e. a non-consumer, Internet related business, founded in July of this year. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge them per Huon's discovery. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I just learned that there's an article on the (notable) parent company PayPoint. So merge and redirect seems another option. Huon (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect with/to PayPoint. I had originally suggested to the article's creator that, rather than a separate article, appropriate information about paypoint.net should be added to the PayPoint article. My advice, it would seem, has been ignored... – ukexpat (talk) 16:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi all,

I believe that Paypoint.net should have its own page. Yes it is owned by paypoint plc but the services that they offer are different is not just paypoint services for ecommerce sites.

I will get sources added to the article, and I hope that will make a difference.

Thanks (Dina Jones (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC))


 * Merge and redirect As the company (division?) becomes more established if it generates substantial newspaper and magazine coverage there might be cause to reconsider. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Sources have been added to the article. Thank you.(Dina Jones (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.