Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paysa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Paysa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Perfect example of the difference between brief mention and in-depth coverage in my opinion. They are mentioned in reliable sources such as Business Insider and Inc., but it is just in passing with a study or survey. Should be deleted based on WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree, there are a lot of articles where Paysa gets mentioned as the data provider but the gist of the articles is about something else. Also note that the first two references in the article are the same news report (word-for-word) with different authors listed for each. Makes me think that many of these mentions are just some sort of promotion or press release. Does not meet notability standards for a corporation.Glendoremus (talk) 04:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article on a non-notable company, propped up by obvious Churnalism. --Calton | Talk 07:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG, NCORP, promo undertones. L3X1 (distant write)  16:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.