Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pe̍h-ōe-jī table


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Pe̍h-ōe-jī. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 14:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Pe̍h-ōe-jī table

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not appropriate here, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor a directory. TheChampionMan1234 06:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. TheChampionMan1234 06:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. TheChampionMan1234 06:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. TheChampionMan1234 06:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * merge back into Pe̍h-ōe-jī, undoing its removal; no need for this to exist as a separate article. It's length was addressed by it being collapsed, it did not and will not make the article too long.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 10:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge. Per . Seems the best option. Pe̍h-ōe-jī is widely used for Romanisation of Min languages and a table of its usage, while not a notable topic in its own right, is fit for inclusion in the main article. Philg88 ♦talk 09:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.