Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peabody (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) StAnselm (talk) 03:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Peabody (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't prove notability Boleyn (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not entirely sure what Boleyn means by "I couldn't prove notability" but given that he/she is AfDing one article every 2 minutes I don't think much effort went into it. It took a little more than 2 minutes to find these which go some way towards establishing notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found a few more and there are several pieces of coverage from reliable sources reproduced here. --Michig (talk) 07:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. The band appears to be notable as per the sources brought up here. Mungo Kitsch 08:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Querulous nomination - David Gerard (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep there are numerous reliable sources that clealry establish the band's notability. Dan arndt (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.