Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Point Entertainment Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Peace Point Entertainment Group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article stub about a non-notable producer of some kind of media (presumably television) Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  22:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep google brings back verification of the company's productions and they are carried on widely available international television carriers, as confirmed by their own materials and IMDB . The article should have some good primary sources. Additionally, the company seems to have been nominated for a Gemini Award which is the Canadian equivalent of the Emmy Awards presented by the The Academy of Canadian Cinema & Television. . I'm usually a hard sell on this kind of thing, but they seem to meet a reasonable threshold. --Torchwood Who? (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Seems to be involved in several notable productions and investments. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * weak keep 16 g news hits UltraMagnusspeak 10:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * keep: it's involved in numerous national television projects in Canada and the US, nominated for prestigious awards like the Geminis, and it's also involoved in broadcasting 2 national television channels in Canada. I think it's notable. musimax. (talk) 23:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.