Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace by Chocolate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 00:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Peace by Chocolate

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORG & invariably do not possess WP:ORGDEPTH. This source almost looks good but overall doesn’t do much for WP:ORGCRIT. A before search links me to primary sources not independent of the organization hence we can’t consider reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

huddle.today/ halifaxtoday.ca/ barrons.com thechronicleherald.ca/ As a nominator it's your job to do better research before you nominate, per the Wiki policies. The founder has also written and book and won awards. I will add some of these sources. You may say they are not from any Tier 1 publications, but as local Canadian company, I think it's got enough coverage to make it notable. Expertwikiguy (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news search brought up at least 10 other sources. Here are a few:
 * I have now added 9 more sources and removed some promotional parts. Expertwikiguy (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Notable company with good coverage in third party references, satisfies WP:ORG. Bretalins (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming, likely WP:UPE. MER-C 15:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: multiple independent sources. Rathfelder (talk) 08:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.