Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace dividend

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP after it was expanded. Mgm|(talk) 20:03, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Peace dividend
Recommend merge this with economics if applicable, and delete. Inter 11:34, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * keep -- both Google and I have heard of the term; a bit of a substub but it's a substub on a notable subject. Dunc|&#9786; 12:44, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * keep -- The term is indeed used in economics, and enough info is out there on the topic so that at least five or six paragraphs could be written on it. That's enough to warrant its own page, I should think.  Eric Herboso  12:48, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable term. At least do not merge to economics, needs a merge target with same level of abstraction. Failing to find one I'm voting plain keep. jni 13:35, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. IMO this is not a substub at all, but a stub. But then I've never really understood what a keepable substub was supposed to be or achieve anyway. Anything that is worth keeping because we think it will grow into an article is, AFAIK, a stub plain and simple. Andrewa 14:55, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it was a substub when it was listed, but the expansion has made it a nice, if not perfect, stub. - RedWordSmith 18:47, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Could be expanded. Jayjg  |  (Talk)  19:31, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. GRider\talk 19:10, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)