Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peach (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect. W.marsh 21:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Peach (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unfinished film with no claim of notability in article. (Perhaps once it's released, it might be notable.) Contested prod. Fabrictramp 17:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability assertion. Since it's unfinished, it shouldn't have an article yet (at least until sources and a reason why it's notable are found).  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 17:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:MOVIE until further down the production line. Accounting4Taste 19:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've seen more trivial entries in this wiki!--87.109.236.84 18:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That argument is dismissed at WP:WAX aka WP:OTHERSTUFF. Accounting4Taste 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm sure it will be notable once released. No harm will be done if readers are redirected to a short write-up at Blender Foundation.  Ichormosquito 17:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N and WP:CBALL.--Voxpuppet (talk • contribs) 09:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blender Foundation. Here's a source, from Ars Technica:    Ichormosquito 17:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I took it upon myself to merge. I think a redirect is the most sensible option now.  Ichormosquito 18:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.