Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peak civilization anachronism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 22:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Peak civilization anachronism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

wp:NEO, and only uses one source. Just summarizes a book. No hits in scholar or news for the made-up phrase or the book title (in English and German). Seems non-notable. NJGW (talk) 17:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - non-notable neologism allegedly created by non-notable writer/artist (whose article is also at AfD). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - made up in a day; even a broader news search online reveals zero sources. Bearian (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — freshacconci  talk talk  19:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable book.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - A book summary of a book with questionable notability. Clubmarx (talk) 17:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 19:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete An essay-like speculation based on a single questionable source. Materialscientist (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.