Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peak oil (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Peak oil (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a pointless disambiguation page. The Hubbert peak theory and the timing page are both prominent at the top of the main Peak oil page, and the page is not disambiguating anything. Fences and windows (talk) 21:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless dab. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Let's delete it. I created the page awhile back because editors were concerned about distinguishing between "peak oil" and the "Hubbert theory of peak oil." This is back when there was no separate peak oil article and the Hubbert theory was the primary article, I argued for the separation and the deal was we'd have some kind of disamb. page to cover any confusion. With the inclusion of wikilinks to Hubbert theory at the top of the peak oil article, I think the issue is safely addressed. Publicus 23:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No need thanks to the magic of wikilinks. It really isn't disambiguating anything, as TPH said; all three articles cover all the topics immediately, and anyone searching for one article would be reasonably pleased with any of the others.  There just isn't enough difference. ~ Amory ( user  •  talk  •  contribs ) 00:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - per above, no longer needed due to wikilinks and "see also"s. Bearian (talk) 23:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree that this is not a useful disambig page.  Dawn Bard (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.