Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeanutButterGamer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt in light of the request and the lengthy deletion log. Closing two hours early as the consensus appears to be obvious. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

PeanutButterGamer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a "YouTube personality" that already was CSD'd 4 times (last in 2016, hence CSD declined this time round). Sourcing consists of YouTube, Twitter, Reddit, assorted forum posts, and a lovely promo interview by an "influencer marketing service". Required reliable and independent sourcing to clear WP:NBIO not in sight. - If deleted, I'd suggest SALTING, otherwise we'll be here again in six months. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources listed aren't reliable. Having 2 million subscribers on YouTube also isn't enough to justify an article. Invalid OS (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - If anything has changed, it’s not apparent in the current article. Fails the WP:GNG. Best case scenario is a WP:TNT. Sergecross73   msg me  01:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Either delete or make a protected redirect to JonTron where he is mentioned as creating it with Jontron.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 03:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - Doesn't pass GNG, and I really don't think it will anytime soon. Hardly notable outside of having subscribers Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per Lee. ZettaComposer (talk) 12:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. The sources are abysmal and obviously promotional. --Kbabej (talk) 20:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: I am not a YouTuber or gamer so I had to follow links in the article, that led to more links-- and on and on--, to find this almost broke subject depends on advertising to gain stature and income that is not a Wikipedia goal of advancing. His estimated net worth is $1.2 million dollars and he is in therapy. I think that amount of money would be good therapy. In the scheme of those that sources cover (among DanTDM–$18.5 million, Jeffree Star–$18 million, Markiplier–$17.5 million down to the lowly rich of Aaron Yonda– $6 million), it would not be some bias to expect better sources that the subject should earn without accolades from a Wikipedia article. Otr500 (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - anybody can be, and is probably related to, a YouTube vlogger. We are not a directory of celebrities. Bearian (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. No need to keep this non-notable article. Masum Reza 📞 00:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per nominator. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 21:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Salt it. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 08:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Please salt this article. I was considering nominating it myself and am glad that someone has done it. AmericanAir88(talk) 16:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.