Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peanut nation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Manning (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Peanut nation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-encyclopedic essay (IMO, should have been speedied, but was told it was not eligible) Mhking (talk) 16:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, nonsense. I agree it should have been speedied. -RiverHockey (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It's actually a work of fiction... is there not a speedy category for this? Let me go check. If I can justify it I will speedy the article and close this AFD.Manning (talk) 16:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. This isn't patent nonsense by a strict interpretation, but considering WP:SNOW perhaps this could be speedied in any case. Tonywalton | Talk 16:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as per nom. Should easily be speedied, but looking at article history not entirely suprised it hasn't been. Hammer1980 ·talk 16:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment from admin closing AFD The article was a lengthy short story and clearly was a work of narrative fiction. I invoked WP:SNOW and took the position that this constituted "nonsense" within an encyclopedia framework and so deleted accordingly. Manning (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.