Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peanuts & Corn Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 10:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Peanuts & Corn Records
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable record lable. Unreferenced since 2008 Pooet (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep one of the largest hip hop labels in Canada. Article has references on it. -DJSasso (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - As the article's creator you may be to close to the subject to be objective. Making the bold statement that it is one of the largest hip hop labels in Canada is not enough. If your claim is true then it would not be difficult to find verifiable references to reliable sources to establish notability. Pooet (talk) 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You mean other than the sources that were on the page when you claimed it was unreferenced? -DJSasso (talk) 03:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * When I claimed it was unreferenced, it was unreferenced, look here. Pooet (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You claim its unreferenced in this AFD. It was referenced before you filed this AFD. That was the prod. -DJSasso (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: Some sources. Maybe not enough to support an article. If no sources are added down the line, might support a delete or merge. Arskwad (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into what article? This article needs reliable 3rd party references to support a claim of notability, and there are none to be found. Pooet (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Other than the reliable third party references that are already in the article, you mean? Bearcat (talk) 05:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sources, from more than one publication of repute and reliability, are already present in the article, so keep. And I trust DJSasso's judgement on a topic relating to Canadian music far sooner than I'd trust Pooet's. Bearcat (talk) 05:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as this nom was non well-intentioned as there are sources as DJSasso indicates.   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.