Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PearCRM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

PearCRM

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication of notability. I have been unable to find any coverage at all. SPA editor. Haakon (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage, not even from the blogosphere. Not notable, or not notable yet. Google link search --Pnm (talk) 06:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, an average product in several crowded fields, without any minimal showing of historical, technical, or cultural importance: ... project-management and customer relationship management tool. And every tiny little one thinks they rate an encyclopedia article. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Nuujinn (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.