Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PearUp Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Revised per User:Toddst1, result should be "delete" as a redirect would provide no context and be confusing. L Faraone  03:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

PearUp Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a company with no coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Sourcing in the article is mostly from unreliable sources, or are not independent. The only source that comes close to be reliable is teh SVG EXaminer, and that is a community newspaper, and that source is simply a legal announcement and not coverage. I can find no coverage when I conducted my own searches. Whpq (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Resident Evil 6. No significant coverage from non-primary reliable source to indicate the company is notable as outlined in the guidelines WP:CORP and WP:GNG. However, the company played a major role in producing content for Resident Evil 6, therefore I am suggesting that the article be redirected to the article about the game, and if the company receives significant coverage in the future it can be recreated.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Currently, the Resident Evil 6 article makes no mention of PearUp Media, or even any mention of the music. that can be fixed by editting, but is that desirable?  I looked for minor recognition of PearUp for the Resident Evil 6 music, and I just don't see it as a passing mention, or of discussion even in unreliable sources.  Given that, I'm not convinced that redirection is the right direction to take. -- Whpq (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper  |  76  14:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.