Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Drummers Forum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  03:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Pearl Drummers Forum
Non notable organization. Self-promotion. POV. Unsuitable for wikipedia. so U  m  y  a  S  ch  07:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit: Made by a member of the forum, to provide information about the forum. Asking other memeber to help contribute. At this moment. It has over 25 thousand members, cant be not noteable. --StrayedFromThePath 07:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit: ^^agrees. The forum is in itself an endless source of valuable information concerning drums, percussion and music in general. It is an important crossroad in the drum forum community. This forum is no means of publicity for Pearl, they've opened the forum so we can discuss the drumming community as a whole. -- Philee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.209.241.138 (talk • contribs)

Edit: The PDF is a huge entity in the online music world, I don't see anything wrong with having something about it on a site like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.77.206.10 (talk • contribs)
 * SMerge with Pearl Drums, alexa rank of 150,407. -- E ivindt@c 11:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I agree with the merge. --StrayedFromThePath 11:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Eivind - and specifically, merge without the absurd list of sections, I think we can rely on the forum webmasters to maintain that one on the site. Just zis Guy you know? 12:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Eivind and JzG, but without the section list or the POV comments about the members of the forum. (Oh, and how do you know there's a drummer at the door?  The knocking speeds up.)  -- E lkman - (talk) 16:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - difficult to justify separate article. - Runcorn 19:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.