Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Thusi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear failure of WP:BEFORE, and the nominator does not make an argument for deletion that is based in the deletion policy. The Bushranger One ping only 11:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Pearl Thusi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. The source used, Incwajana.com is unreliable and unknown. It's authority is not recognized therefore this article should be deleted. It is created for web presence and does not show importance. Wikipedia is not meant to promote celebrities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacleaner (talk • contribs) 27 November 2015‎

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - While the current article's source is not reliable, the subject does pass WP:GNG. Plenty of available citations such as this, this, this, this, this, this and this. And that's only on the first two pages at News.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.