Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl of the Pacific


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Pearl of the Pacific

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable building. Searches come up with a different building and not the one in this article (very little to zero references). GrayFullbuster (talk) 06:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL. I can't find any coverage of this building in reliable sources, or indeed evidence of any kind that this is even a real proposal. The developer is supposedly Federal Land, but their website makes no mention of the project. Camerafiend (talk) 23:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. While I support having a supertall skyscraper taller than the Petronas Towers in my country, there just isn't enough reliable sources at the moment to either establish notability or to even verify it. A search I did for "Pearl of the Pacific" leads to a resort in Boracay. If reliable sources in the future have enough coverage on it, then the article can be created, but for now, it's just simply too soon. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.