Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearlman's Jewelers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. only (talk) 04:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Pearlman's Jewelers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable; almost all of the refs are either from its website or about a product it sells.  DGG ( talk ) 17:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The jckonline ref seems ok. I can't assess the paywalled one.  Maybe a merge to D.NEA, or merge that here. Don't consider this as a keep vote, though.  Voting sucks, anyway. &mdash;Cryptic 17:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete When they open a second store maybe we can reconsider. Truth to the Fourth Power (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete It's hard to see this company as notable - everything here is simply business as usual. Note that there is a companion article D.NEA which interlinks with this one and has even fewer reliable sources. LaMona (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:ADMASQ. Pax 09:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.