Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PearlsOnly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, the article has been speedy deleted as G11 by User:Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) SwisterTwister   talk  07:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

PearlsOnly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:PROD. No evidence of notability per WP:CORP. Sources provided are all primary or review/blog sites. Kinu t/c 05:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed, Google News provided nothing relevant despite adding "2003", "jewellery", "Paul Lepa" and "Hong Kong". I'm willing to reconsider my vote if Chinese sources are found. SwisterTwister   talk  07:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete no reliable information showing notability.  DGG ( talk ) 22:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. A search did not bring up anything that would show notability for this company. Other than tons of product listings of various sorts, there's nothing out there. It doesn't help that the page for this is borderline promotional with phrases such as "Jewellery from PearlsOnly is available from many of the online retail chains, such as Amazon and Epinions."Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going to try speedying it, but I'm not sure why this was relisted. It's a fairly clear delete here.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.