Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peat pulp bath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Peat pulp bath

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't think the source I found before prodding is enough to show notability Chidgk1 (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: I found this sourced article:, but it appears to be tertiary. All other sources I could find were trying to sell something. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, History, Environment,  and Geography. Skynxnex (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is scientific evidence on physiological mechanisms and efficacy of peat pulp therapy. I added two sectios on both topics and provided references.--Jwdietrich2 (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - seems to be a topic of discussion by academics in published papers, which is normally considered a strong sign of notability. JMWt (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.