Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pechersk School International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 17:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Pechersk School International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is very much a promotion and the cleanup most likely can't save the article. It's contributors are mostly students and other people affiliated with the school. This explains the very accurate description of the school in the article, seemingly without having references. Friy Man talk 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * It's an IB school, usually they get some press. Also, if it's truly the only school in Ukraine to be accredited in three IB programs, that may provide some notability. This seems to be one for further research. Someone with Ukrainian and/or Russian language may be able to help. Jack N. Stock (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is no policy reason to delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well,, WP:PROMOTION Clearly says, that Wikipedia is not for promotion. This is the reason, why this article is nominated for deletion. Cheers, Friy Man  talk 08:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. AusLondonder (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. In order to be deleted as advertising, an article must not have any relevant or encyclopedic content. See DEL4. Even our most unsympathetic subjects, say, biographies of businessmen admittedly written by PR agents, are rarely deleted at AFD as advertising, and the recent schools RFC made clear that schools are to be treated with particular concern. This article has more than enough encyclopedic, if uncited, information to foreclose deletion on promotionalism grounds, and no other reason for deletion has been advanced. Rebb  ing  13:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.