Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. There is no consensus to delete. Arguments for moving to Pedantry are strong, but that is outside the scope of this AfD. Owen&times; &#9742;  13:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Pedant

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Dictionary definition with etymology. Violates WP:NOTDICT.  - Skipple  ☎  03:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions.   - Skipple   ☎  03:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Move to Pedantry, as per Chiswick Chap. -Samoht27 (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Keep - I don't wish to be, er. pedantic here, but the criterion for notability is not whether the article is poorly-cited, but whether there are suitable sources out there in the world. Pedantry is unfortunately definitely a notable topic. Sources include the famous essay Of Pedantry by Michel de Montaigne, alongside a mass of modern research papers on a wide variety of aspects of pedantry. A good newspaper article is Why do pedants pedant? in The Guardian. There's plenty more out there. The article needs to be rewritten, but that's not a matter for AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This feels... pedantic... but I agree with your argument yet think it supports a move to Pedantry. Orange sticker (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That would make good sense, yes. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't necessarily disagree with the creation of Pedantry but it seems that would be a new article rather than a move of the current article. Certainly once it's created we can redirect, but until that's the case I'm not convinced Pedant should remain.  - Skipple   ☎  13:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Delete as per nomination. This is just a dictionary definition with a couple of cites. Per WP:!, it needs expansion to be useful which might be possible. If someone does this then perhaps reconsider.Ldm1954 (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Are there editors up for rewriting this article? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * @Liz If needed, I can put this on my backlog. I have a few major tasks that I wanted to complete beforehand, but I volunteer to fix article up if it is kept and/or moved. Thanks, Neuropol  Talk  14:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 19:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef. Desertarun (talk) 16:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep and move to pedantry. This is certainly notable, and could be expanded greatly. Wikipedia may not be a dictionary, but pedantry as a concept is a very notable topic which could be applied to the fields of psychology, linguistics, and sociology. Deletion should not be a substitution for improvement. Thanks, Neuropol  Talk  13:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.