Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peder Christian Hersleb Kjerschow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Peder Christian Hersleb Kjerschow

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a new article by an established user. I am listing it here because it appears that the subject fails the notability test. The article's creator asserts that the subject is notable, because he was a bishop for 27 years. The subject was also a relative of a Prime Minister. I contend that neither of these facts confer notability, and a re-reading of WP:NOTE seems to confirm this. The article's creator seems not to want to discuss the issue further, and while he has provided some sources (he says that not many are available online), in my view he has not provided evidence of the subject's notability. Exploding Boy (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on new information provided by the article's creator (see below) I am withdrawing my nomination at this time. Exploding Boy (talk) 23:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I wouldn't have started an article on him myself, but no special reason to delete one. There are sources for the information in the article. I'm not sure how important a bishop is in Norwegian society, but he was also the grandfather of the prime minister. (unsigned comment by User:Steve Dufour)
 * Comment: Under "Invalid criteria" at WP:NOTE it specifically says: "that person A has a relationship with well-known person B is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); see Relationships do not confer notability. " It appears that Kjerschow's only personal claim to notability is having been a bishop.  Is that sufficient per our guidelines?  It's unclear, but I don't think so.  Other bishops with articles here have other claims to notability, such as being authors, or being involved in historic events and so on. Exploding Boy (talk) 23:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. In my opinion, as article creator, the article already asserted notability. Because:
 * In 1830, Norway had (and still has) an Evangelical Lutheran state religion. Free churches, Judaism and other religions were banned according to the 1814 Constitution. As such there existed only one organized religion in this Northern European country. The state church was structured into five dioceses at the time; Christiania (Oslo), Christianssand, Bjørgvin, Nidaros and Tromsø (later: Hålogaland). With one bishop per diocese, and no archbishop, there were a total of six religious leaders in Norway at any time. (note: this includes the King, the highest leader of the church).
 * Peder Christian Hersleb Kjerschow was such a religious leader for twenty-seven years. This is notable, and he was no doubt covered by his contemporary press, in books and the like. Biasing oneself towards Internet sources isn't feasible, as it effectively constitutes a version of the Google test. Notability does not expire. This is not to say that the 19th century religious leader is not covered by a number of Internet sources. He is, and this is reflected in the article.
 * It should be noted that the article does not exist because of his grandparenthood, although this constitutes an interesting part of his life. The fact that the article includes such information should not be used against the article. Punkmorten (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I certainly don't suggest that his relationship with a famous person should be counted against him, but I wish you had (a) said all this before, and (b) added it to the article when you were first asked about notability. That would have solved the issue at the tag stage without the need to bring it here.
 * Based on the above I will withdraw my nomination for deletion at this time, with a request for Punkmorten to add the relevant information to the article. Exploding Boy (talk) 23:57, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Add the whole background about the Church of Norway? Punkmorten (talk) 23:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Why are you making this so hard? Add the relevant information to the article so that the subject's notability is clear, per WP:NOTE. Exploding Boy (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.