Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedia document


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 04:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Pedia document

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sure if the thing exists, but it certainly has a useless article title. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 06:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Pandanus tectorius/Stuff to merge or something, then merge to Pandanus tectorius. Then speedy delete the resulting redirect from Pedia document (WP:CSD or WP:CSD). Seems to survive a quick google test for copyvio . GFDL requires that we keep the history of articles merged elsewhere, but I don't believe it requires we keep them at the original title, especially in a case where the original title is useless (as in this case). cab 06:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, we already have an article, and this reads so very much like a cut-and-paste from a textbook or something similar. --Dhartung | Talk 07:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - article also is an orphan. Guroadrunner 07:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment this seems to be the author's first contribution... I think s/he wants to improve pandanus tectorius and his using this as some kind of sandbox.
 * I think this might be the explanation. I've put a note on the editor's talk page. Espresso Addict 03:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with Pandanus tectorius for obvious reasons. Dan Gluck 06:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - looks like a test page, looking at the history. I'm not 100% sure so I won't delete it but that's my vote. ugen64 05:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.