Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Nobre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Pedro Nobre

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Obviously fails WP:ACADEMIC. Why was CSD denied, in what way does this 'assert notability'?  Chzz  ►  08:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  09:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is asserted by Editorial Board membership and several awards, so this is indeed not a speedy. However, the awards are minor and an editorial board membership does not suffice to meet the notability criteria of WP:ACADEMIC. Unless other sources crop up, fails WP:PROF. --Crusio (talk) 10:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Citation impact seems to be low. No book entries on WorldCat. Some independent news coverage, but not enough for WP:BIO. I do not think that the Portuguese Society of Clinical Sexology is at a level of prestige that would justify inclusion under WP:PROF criterion #3 (as elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association). According to his university, he is currently a “Professor Auxiliar”, which is akin to a senior assistant/new associate in the American system.--Eric Yurken (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I also point out he is only a Section Editor of the  journal (Cognitive and Behavioral Practice), whose editor in chief is actually Stefan G. Hofmann  . We do notgenerally  consider other than ed. in chief as necessarily implying notability. DGG (talk) 01:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.