Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  08:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable individual. MCNBiografias is not reliable, and the only other accesible source is the Library of the Chilean Congress, which is a catalog entry for a book of Cruz, but that does not make him notable. Diego Grez (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please see the following References are added where they do literary Interest, these primary sources are aggregated into the article and these are: [Study on Chilean literature, 1940, Pastene foreword written by M. Correa, October 1940] and [History of Literature Illustrated Francisco A. Encina, written by Leopoldo Castedo, vol. 11, pp. 144-152]

You can see here the proposed deletion [] which does not take into account the references of this literary critic --Historiador1923 (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficient impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC).
 * Weak keep A GBooks search shows several apparently reliable sources with snippets that seem to promise something more than a passing mention. Unfortunately, they are all in Spanish and (as already said) snippets. However, unless and until they can be shown not to live up to their promise, I think it best to keep the article on grounds of avoiding systemic bias, as online sources about a Chilean literary critic who died nearly eighty years ago are likely to be only a fraction of the offline ones. PWilkinson (talk) 22:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Besides mentions in several Nation-wide newspapers Cruz Vergara is praised by an apparently notable writer/critic. As "good" and relevant literature is the one that is praised by critics he has apparently some notability. Sietecolores (talk) 16:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Significant figure in the Chilean literary scene who passes notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.