Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Olmos Muñoz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nom withdrawn. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Pedro Olmos Muñoz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable individual. Diego Grez (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. An AFD for this article was just closed 12 July 2014.  As for Diego Grez's AFD nomination of Adriana Valdés article at about the same time, which had a prior AFD closed 15 July 2014, this seems inappropriate to me.  There is no new information, no reason why a new AFD should be opened immediately.  I assume Diego Grez means well, but there must be criteria for when a new AFD should be allowed, which should be explained. -- do  ncr  am  02:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Several references are irrelevant. However, two indicate a possibility of limited notability.--Rpclod (talk) 03:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Weak delete - doncram is right, though the closer specifically cited WP:NPASR and the nominator followed those instructions. There was literally zero participation in the last discussion. I can't see that any of the external links (which I assume are supposed to double as sources) provide anything by way of significant coverage in reliable sources. Some simply confirm he existed and that he studied alongside a long list of others. Not seeing anything that would allow this fellow to pass WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you User:Stalwart111 for explaining and pointing to wp:NPASR. I had assumed there must be some policy against quick renominations, but see now that this renomination was fine after all.  Living and learning. -- do  ncr  am  15:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: There appears to be a University Centre named after this individual: . AllyD (talk) 06:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Game over.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Good find. I'm withdrawing this nomination. However, I still think the article lacks references (of significance) to prove he was notable; the Universidad de Talca link is a good one. --Diego Grez (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks User:Diego Grez. I wanna concede that the case for notability here is marginal, so the nomination was good to make.  But with your withdrawing this by your statement, and seeing no Delete votes, this could be closed Keep now. -- do  ncr  am  15:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.