Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Thiago of Orléans-Braganza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Pedro Thiago of Orléans-Braganza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obscure member of former royal house which was deposed some time ago. PatGallacher (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The article was deleted from Wikipedia in Portuguese. Monarchy was abolished from Brazil in 1889, and there are no signs of return. He is presented as being in the line of succession of a throne that does not exist any more (for more than 100 years), which means almost nothing nowadays: Zero political power. In 1993 people voted the possibility of changing the form and system of Government in Brazil to Monarchy or Parlamentarism and the result was that the vast majority of Brazilians did not want to change them that after more than 100 years of Republican Democracy. There are some sources about the "royal family", but several Newspaper News receive more coverage than any news about any member of the "Brazilian Royal Family". Once in a blue moon there is a news about some of them, which is far from significant. In Portuguese Wikipedia, several members in the line of succession of House of Orléans-Braganza were deleted, for instance 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (AFDs from Portuguese in Wikipedia). Bolhones (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete When this 41 year old was born the throne had been dead for 90 years, and there have never been any serious attempts to bring it back in basically 130 years. This is the definition of a ludicous article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the above, a hypothetical heir to a historical empire does not an article warrant, unless notable for other reasons, which this gentleman does not seem to be. JohnmgKing (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as stated above. Also WP:NOTINHERITED. EverybodyEdits (talk) 05:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water   (talk)  14:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.