Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Tudela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Pedro Tudela

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

BLP unsourced for 2 years, no reliable secondary sources appear to exist. Kevin (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Kevin (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * comment google news seems to have some links that might be about him, but they're in spanish, which is a language I don't speak. Anyone fluent who can parse through and see if there's any wheat, or if its all chaff? Umbralcorax (talk) 00:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per added I've added to the article from the Glasgow Herald, the BBC, and Artforum International. At least one of the mentions is passing, but the artist has received attention in significant worldwide publications, and most of the publications are in Portugese (the ones I've added are in English), there's also at least one in Italian and another in Spanish. The above sources convince me that the artist is notable via the GNG directly, and with a Portugese-speaking editor the article could likely be whipped into a much better shape, I'm hesitant to take on the project using automated translation, art terms are fairly poorly translated by such. --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  16:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Joe Decker, seems to have been a poor nomination.--Milowent • talkblp-r 05:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems, in its current state, to be a straightforward pass of the GNG and CREATIVE. Ray  Talk 02:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not all of the hits for his name in Google news archive seem to be about the same person. But enough of them are, and enough of them have been added to the article, that this looks like a pass of WP:CREATIVE #3 and WP:GNG to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.